El Niño is strengthening as Brazil and Argentina enter the 2026-27 planting season this September, creating sharply different weather risks for South America's two agricultural powers and potentially altering competition for U.S. corn and soybean exports. NOAA's Climate Prediction Center says there is now a greater than 90% chance that the event will become very strong during the Northern Hemisphere fall and winter. That matters for U.S. agriculture because weather-driven changes in South American yields can quickly affect commodity prices, export demand, feed costs and the global grain supply chain.

The latest official assessment reviewed by Agrolatam shows just how unusual the developing event could become. NOAA estimates a 69% chance that El Niño will reach a historic threshold during October-December 2026, exceeding the strength of previous events in records dating to 1950 under the agency's current Relative Oceanic Niño Index methodology. July readings already showed Niño-3.4 at +1.4°C, Niño-3 at +1.7°C and Niño-1+2 at +2.9°C. NOAA stresses, however, that exceptional El Niño strength increases the probability of characteristic weather impacts but does not guarantee that every agricultural region will follow the historical pattern.

Biologicals markets trends

Agricultural Biologicals Are Maturing: Six Lessons the Industry Can No Longer Ignore

That distinction is particularly important in South America, where El Niño can produce dramatically different outcomes within the same growing season. A stronger southern storm track can increase rainfall opportunities across Argentina and southern Brazil, while tropical circulation changes can contribute to less favorable rainfall patterns farther north. For growers, the critical variables will be rainfall timing, soil-moisture reserves and extreme temperatures, rather than the El Niño classification alone. These differences could influence planting decisions, crop development and ultimately soybean and corn yields during the months when South American supplies begin competing directly with U.S. grain in international markets.

Argentina enters September with considerable flexibility despite concerns surrounding soil moisture and cool early-season conditions in parts of the agricultural belt. Corn producers traditionally have more than one planting opportunity, allowing them to distribute weather risk between early and later crops. A wetter spring and summer pattern associated with El Niño would improve yield prospects if rainfall reaches the main production areas at critical stages, particularly around corn pollination and soybean reproductive development. That potential recovery would also strengthen Argentina's position as a competitor in global corn, soybean meal and soybean oil markets during 2027.

Southern Brazil could also benefit from an active rainfall pattern, particularly where soils enter planting with adequate moisture. Yet more rain does not automatically mean higher yields. Repeated storms can produce waterlogging, flooding, crop damage and transportation disruptions around rivers and low-lying areas. For the agricultural supply chain, excessive rainfall can become especially important when it affects rural roads, storage facilities or routes connecting farms with ports. Farmers and co-ops will therefore be watching not only accumulated precipitation but also the frequency and intensity of individual storm systems throughout soybean development.

Central Brazil becomes the key variable for U.S. grain markets

The more consequential uncertainty for global agricultural markets may develop across central Brazil. Mato Grosso and neighboring producing states are essential to the country's enormous soybean and second-crop corn output, making weather conditions there particularly relevant to U.S. producers. Any prolonged combination of irregular rainfall and extreme heat during soybean establishment, flowering or pod filling could reduce yield potential, while planting delays could push the subsequent safrinha corn crop deeper into its traditionally drier production window. That relationship means one weather problem can potentially carry over from soybeans into corn.

The mechanism behind the concern is consistent with the broader evolution of the Pacific climate system. NOAA reports that convection and rainfall have become enhanced over the central and eastern tropical Pacific while being suppressed over Indonesia as the ocean and atmosphere become increasingly coupled. El Niño is expected to continue strengthening through the end of 2026, according to the agency's official outlook, which incorporates multiple forecasting systems from the United States and abroad. The International Research Institute for Climate and Society has likewise reported broad model agreement that El Niño will remain established into early 2027, although individual models differ on its ultimate intensity.

For Brazilian producers, rainfall distribution could matter as much as seasonal totals. Soybeans need reliable moisture for establishment and reproductive development, while safrinha corn depends heavily on both planting timing and stored soil moisture as the rainy season retreats. A delayed soybean cycle can narrow the optimal second-crop corn planting window, exposing corn to greater moisture stress later in development. Precision agriculture, soil-moisture monitoring and careful input-cost management could therefore become increasingly valuable as growers decide when to plant and how aggressively to invest in fields facing uncertain rainfall.

The implications reach directly into the United States. Brazil's position in global soybean and corn trade means changes in its production prospects can influence Chicago futures, basis levels, export competition and feed costs. Strong crops in Argentina and southern Brazil could increase competitive pressure on U.S. exports, while significant production problems in central Brazil could tighten global supplies and redirect additional demand toward American grain. U.S. farmers will therefore have another reason to monitor South American weather while making decisions involving crop insurance, hedging, storage, fertilizer purchases and 2027 acreage.

For now, the most defensible conclusion is not that South America faces a uniform crop disaster, but that an unusually powerful El Niño is increasing the geographical divergence of agricultural risk. NOAA's greater-than-90% probability of a very strong event makes the phenomenon impossible for commodity markets to ignore, but rainfall during the next several months will determine the actual production outcome. For U.S. farmers, agronomists, co-ops and investors, the central question will be whether stronger production in Argentina and southern Brazil can offset potential stress in Brazil's massive central crop belt.