While public attention focuses on the military and diplomatic consequences, American farmers also have reasons to closely monitor these developments.

In my view, the agricultural sector is once again caught in the crossfire of international decisions. Historically, crises in the Middle East have directly impacted oil prices, which in turn affect input costs (fertilizers, fuel, transportation) essential to our production. On top of that come potential disruptions in trade agreements that limit access to key international markets for U.S. commodities.

This isn't just a matter of national security-it's a matter of food security. If the conflict escalates and exports are compromised-either through sanctions or trade retaliation-corn, soybeans, and wheat could see price volatility that complicates medium-term planning. This volatility, as producers well know, has real consequences: from access to farm loans to planting decisions under risk.

Global uncertainty could also redirect federal resources, affecting USDA programs or the upcoming farm bill, which is currently at a critical negotiation stage. It would be a mistake to underestimate how a security crisis can undermine sustainable agriculture initiatives, investments in agritech, or the expansion of conservation practices on our land.

What I propose is not alarmism, but preparation. It's time for farmers, co-ops, and rural leaders to get involved in the political and geostrategic debate. We must demand that our representatives ensure the protection of the agri-food supply chain and prioritize rural development-even in scenarios of international crisis. Because U.S. agriculture cannot become the collateral victim of conflicts fought thousands of miles from our plains.